Of course the object of HHO on demand is not to create energy to run your car. It's an additive to improve the ignition of the gasoline. The naysayers always want to reference to the law of physics that says you cannot get more energy out than you put in, but they have missed the point.
Now with that said, here is a very interesting experiment. How much return do we get from the energy we use to create HHO.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2JkQZIm1wN0
It's not really important to know, but this experiment shows that even with a respectable mmw of over 5.00 a return of only 1.8 percent can be expected. I wanted to mention it here because it is an interesting experiment. Thank you AllgoodAutomation for all your hard work.
The research I did may still help others so I'll leave the site up, but my interests have taken me permanently away from HHO. Visit my YouTube channel at http://www.youtube.com/user/HHO4gas Download my latest HHO files at: http://www.4shared.com/u/zvmszps/94d1bc4f/Bob_Campbell.html
Blog Archive
-
▼
2008
(46)
-
▼
September
(16)
- 7.00 mmw and above?
- 1.8% return of energy. Hey that's not bad!
- Peter A. Lindemann, D.Sc.
- MMW Efficiency and Voltage
- 304 vs 316 Stainless Steel
- License Plate Electrolyzer
- Bob Boyce - e-mail to Sterling
- Ford will not let America have it's 65 MPG car
- Q and A
- Bob Campbells Videos
- Conductivity and Resistivity of Water
- The Resistance of Stainless Steel Plates
- Conclusion To The Power Supply Dilemma.
- Possible Breakthrough Stumbled Upon
- Battery Charger and Power Supply too?
- Update to Power Supplies
-
▼
September
(16)
Monday, September 29, 2008
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Here's a good site run by a couple guys building a Bob Boyce cell. They claim to have achieved 200 percent faraday hho production using the "101 plate" series cell (without any fancy electronics), have look here: http://waterfuelforall.com/forum/index.php?topic=423.0
ReplyDelete